Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX

The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT, 3000-C, left and right hand, Spinning Fishing Reel, Front Drag, 10609-300
Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT
Spinning
72.20 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.73 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings6

Technical Specifications

  • BrandDAIWA
  • The main category of the reelSpinning
  • Price range~ €96.33
  • Is saltwater resistantNo
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size3000-C
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT, 6000SS-CP, left and right hand, Feeder fishing reel, Front Drag, 10317-600
Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT
Feeder And Match
88.30 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight385g / 13.58oz
Line retireve per crank86 centimeter / 33.86 inch
Ball bearings5

Technical Specifications

  • BrandDAIWA
  • The main category of the reelFeeder and match
  • Price range~ €183.33
  • Is saltwater resistantNo
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size6000SS-CP
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Conclusion

Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX edges out Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (5.5 out of 10) and the line retrieve per crank (86 centimeter / 33.86 inch). Still, Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX holds its own with strengths like a weight of 215g / 7,58oz and a ergonomics of 6.28 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.

What's the difference between Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT and Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT?

There are not much differences between the two comparables