Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX

The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT

Spinning

72.20 out of 100

Value for money4 out of 5

Quality classMedium

Durability3.73 out of 10

Ergonomics6.28 out of 10

Gear ratio5.3:1

Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs

Weight215g / 7.58oz

Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch

Ball bearings6

Technical Specifications

BrandDAIWA
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €96.33
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size3000-C
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Daiwa 24 TDR QD

Feeder And Match

84.40 out of 100

Value for money4.5 out of 5

Quality classExcellent

Durability5.5 out of 10

Ergonomics5.94 out of 10

Gear ratio4.8:1

Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs

Weight300g / 10.58oz

Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch

Ball bearings8+1

Technical Specifications

BrandDAIWA
The main category of the reelFeeder and match
Price range~ €229.33
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size3012QD-DH
Handle typeDouble handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Conclusion

Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX edges out Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (5.5 out of 10) and the total score (8.44 out of 10). Still, Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 6 and a gear ratio of 5.3:1, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.