Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R

The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT

Spinning

72.20 out of 100

Value for money4 out of 5

Quality classMedium

Durability3.73 out of 10

Ergonomics6.28 out of 10

Gear ratio5.3:1

Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs

Weight215g / 7.58oz

Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch

Ball bearings6

Technical Specifications

BrandDAIWA
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €96.33
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size3000-C
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R

Seafishing

54.90 out of 100

Value for money4 out of 5

Quality classMedium

Durability3.88 out of 10

Ergonomics5.51 out of 10

Gear ratio4.9:1

Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs

Weight625g / 22.05oz

Line retireve per crank103 centimeter / 40.55 inch

Ball bearings3

Technical Specifications

BrandDAIWA
The main category of the reelSeafishing
Price range~ €125.33
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size-
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/300

Conclusion

Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX edges out Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R with slightly better overall performance, especially on the line retrieve per crank (80 centimeter / 31.5 inch) and the ball bearings (6). Still, Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R holds its own with strengths like a gear ratio of 4.9:1, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.

What's the difference between Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT and Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R?

Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX

6.43 out of 10 (80 centimeter / 31.5 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques