Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag

Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT
Spinning
72.20 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.73 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €96.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
45.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank68cm / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.20mm/140m
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX clearly outshines Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and ball bearings (6). While Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT and Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag?
Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- 6.43 out of 10 (80 centimeter / 31.5 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500-HX vs Shimano Sedona 500 FI


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X


Shimano Vanford FA C3000AX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X


Shimano Vanford FA C3000AX vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000AX


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500HGAX


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 500X


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 500X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX


Shimano Sedona 500 FI vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 500X


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000AX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500-HX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500HGAX
