Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT
Spinning
72.20 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.73 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €96.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.51 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight520g / 18.34oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €154.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size25N
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 315/0.32
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX edges out Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and the gear ratio (5.3:1). Still, Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX holds its own with strengths like a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R


Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 6000X vs Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L


Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX vs Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX


Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Shimano Tyrnos 30 II


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX vs Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R
