Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT
Spinning
72.20 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.73 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €96.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX edges out Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and the gear ratio (5.3:1). Still, Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX holds its own with strengths like a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
Similar comparisons

Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 4000D-CX vs Penn Battle III 3000X


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Delphin HORNET 60X


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX


Shimano Stradic GTM 4000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 6000X


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Shimano Stradic GTM 4000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ 500X


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX


Penn Battle III 3000X vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX


Shimano Sahara FJ 500X vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Delphin HORNET 60X vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX
