Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT
Spinning
72.20 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.73 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €96.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
Multireels
73.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.73 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.2:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight1230g / 43.39oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €622.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/300
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX and Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX offers a ball bearings of 6, while Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 stands out for a durability of 5.73 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT and Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000?
Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.57 out of 10 (215g / 7,58oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano 20 Stella 5000 XGX vs Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX


Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX


Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Shimano 20 Stella 5000 XGX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX


Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX vs Daiwa RX LT 2500X


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX vs Daiwa RX LT 2500X


Shimano Catana FE C 3000X vs Shimano 20 Stella 5000 XGX


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H vs Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF vs Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX


Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX


Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX


Shimano 20 Stella 5000 XGX vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX


Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX
