Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX

Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT
Spinning
72.20 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.73 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €96.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Shimano Vanquish FC
Spinning
84.10 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio6.4:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight170g / 6oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €407.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC3000XGC
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130
Conclusion
Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX edges out Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (9.5 out of 10) and the line retrieve per crank (94 centimeter / 37.01 inch). Still, Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX holds its own with strengths like a gear ratio of 5.3:1 and a ball bearings of 6, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT and Shimano Vanquish FC?
Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X


Daiwa Freams LT 3000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X


Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 1000X


Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX


Daiwa Freams LT 3000X vs Daiwa GS LTD 3000X


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 1000X vs Daiwa GS LTD 3000X


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 1000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX


Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX vs Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X


Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI vs Shimano Stradic GTM 2500 RC Spinning reel with fighting drag
