Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x

Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT
Spinning
72.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.74 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight240g / 8.47oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €98.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Abu GARCIA Zenon
Spinning
86.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.54 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight138g / 4.87oz
Line retireve per crank69 centimeter / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandABU GARCIA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €326.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000 S
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.17/100
Conclusion
Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x edges out Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (9.5 out of 10) and the total score (8.6 out of 10). Still, Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 6 and a maximum drag of 12kg / 26,46lbs, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT and Abu GARCIA Zenon?
Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX vs Delphin CarbonIX 1000X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano 19 Stella 20000 PGX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CXHX vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X


Shimano 19 Stella 20000 PGX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 6000X vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2500SX


Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX vs Shimano 19 Stella 14000 XGX


Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 6000X vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X


Shimano 19 Stella 20000 PGX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2500SX


Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X vs Shimano 19 Stella 20000 PGX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2000X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 6000X


Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2000X


Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI vs Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X


Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX vs Shimano 19 Stella 14000 XGX


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 6000X
