Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX

Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT
Spinning
72.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.74 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight240g / 8.47oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €98.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Abu GARCIA Zenon
Spinning
83.30 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.47 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5.2kg / 11,46lbs
Weight160g / 5.64oz
Line retireve per crank96 centimeter / 37.8 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandABU GARCIA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €326.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 SH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/150
Conclusion
Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX edges out Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (9.5 out of 10) and the line retrieve per crank (96 centimeter / 37.8 inch). Still, Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX holds its own with strengths like a maximum drag of 12kg / 26,46lbs and a ball bearings of 6, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT and Abu GARCIA Zenon?
Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X


Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2500D-XH 2500D-XHX


Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX


Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Aero C5000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2500X vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2500D-XH 2500D-XHX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2500D-XH 2500D-XHX vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2500X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX vs Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX


Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX vs Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX


Shimano FX 1000 FCX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2500X


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX vs Penn FIERCE IV 2000X
