Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX

Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT
Spinning
72.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.74 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight240g / 8.47oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €98.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
84.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.5 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight150g / 5.29oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €635.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000D-P
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX edges out Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (9.5 out of 10) and the total score (8.44 out of 10). Still, Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 6 and a maximum drag of 12kg / 26,46lbs, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?
Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 5000D-C 5000D-CX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 5000 XGFJX


Daiwa 19 Certate 4000CXHX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2000X vs Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX


Penn Battle III 6000X vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 FJX


Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X vs Delphin ELIXIR 4000X


Shimano Sedona 8000 FI vs Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX


Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX vs Delphin ELIXIR 2000X


Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 FJX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX


Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 FJX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 5000X


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 5000X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000-XHX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX


Delphin ELIXIR 2000X vs Penn Battle III 6000X


Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 5000X


Penn Battle III 6000X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000-XHX


Shimano 21 Sustain 5000 XGFJX vs Shimano Sedona 8000 FI


Daiwa 19 Certate 4000CXHX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 5000 XGFJX
