Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT
Spinning
72.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.74 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight240g / 8.47oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €98.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Daiwa TANACOM
Multireels
72.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.72 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio2.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight2040g / 71.96oz
Line retireve per crank59 centimeter / 23.23 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €603.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1200
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.42/1000
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX and Daiwa TANACOM 1200X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX offers a gear ratio of 5.2:1, while Daiwa TANACOM 1200X stands out for a durability of 5.72 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT and Daiwa TANACOM?
Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.4 out of 10 (240g / 8,47oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Shimano 21 Sustain 5000 XGFJX vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX


Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 HGFJX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX


Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX vs Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 5000 XGFJX


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX vs Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X


Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX


Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X
