Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag

Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT
Spinning
72.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.74 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight240g / 8.47oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €98.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
42.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight370g / 13.05oz
Line retireve per crank92cm / 36.22 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.30mm/220m
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX clearly outshines Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and ball bearings (6). While Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT and Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag?
Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.4 out of 10 (240g / 8,47oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX vs Penn Battle III 6000X


Penn Battle III 3000X vs Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X


Penn Battle III 3000X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 1000X


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX vs Penn Battle III 3000X


Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 6000X vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 1000X


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X vs Shimano Sahara 2500 R


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX vs Penn Battle III 3000X


Penn Battle III 3000X vs Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R


Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX


Shimano Catana 3000 SRC vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX vs Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X vs Shimano Catana 3000 SRC


Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R vs Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 HGFJX


Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX
