Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX vs Penn Battle III 8000 HSX

Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT
Spinning
72.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.74 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight240g / 8.47oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €98.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Penn Battle III
Spinning
69.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag13.6kg / 29,98lbs
Weight785g / 27.7oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €127.60
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.46/335
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX and Penn Battle III 8000 HSX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX offers a line retrieve per crank of 82 centimeter / 32.28 inch, while Penn Battle III 8000 HSX stands out for a durability of 8.5 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT and Penn Battle III?
Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX
- With a score like 8.4 out of 10 (240g / 8,47oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Penn Battle III 8000 HSX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX


Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500X


Shimano Vanford FA C3000HGAX vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X vs Daiwa Regal LT 1000 DX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000HGAX


Shimano Vanford FA 2500SHGAX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500X


Daiwa Crossfire LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500X


Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX


Shimano Vanford FA 2500SHGAX vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X


Daiwa Regal LT 1000 DX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX


Daiwa BG 5000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX


Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500X vs Delphin INKS 2000X


Daiwa BG 5000X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX
