Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT
Spinning
72.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.74 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight240g / 8.47oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €98.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.54 out of 10
Ergonomics5.91 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight535g / 18.87oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €161.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 400/0.4
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX edges out Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and the gear ratio (5.2:1). Still, Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX holds its own with strengths like a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
Similar comparisons

Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Daiwa Freams LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2000D-XH 2000D-XHX vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2000D-XH 2000D-XHX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX


Daiwa GS LTD 3000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 3000-C / JB4 0.19MM YELLOW 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 3000-C / JB4 0.19MM YELLOW 3000-CX vs Daiwa Freams LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000-CXHX


Shimano Catana FE 1000X vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX


Shimano Catana FE 1000X vs Daiwa GS LTD 3000X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 3000-C / JB4 0.19MM YELLOW 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 3000-C / JB4 0.19MM YELLOW 3000-CX vs Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX


Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX


Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X


Daiwa GS LTD 3000X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Torium 30PGAX


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX vs Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX
