Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT
Spinning
72.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.74 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight240g / 8.47oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €98.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.54 out of 10
Ergonomics5.91 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight535g / 18.87oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €161.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30 LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 400/0.4
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX edges out Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and the gear ratio (5.2:1). Still, Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX holds its own with strengths like a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
Similar comparisons

Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX


Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Shimano Stella FK C 5000 XGX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Shimano Stella FK C 5000 XGX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 1000DX vs Shimano Stella FK C 5000 XGX


Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X


Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 1000DX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H
