Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT
Spinning
72.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.74 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight240g / 8.47oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €98.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
Multireels
73.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.73 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.2:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight1230g / 43.39oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €622.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/300
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX and Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX offers a ball bearings of 6, while Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 stands out for a durability of 5.73 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT and Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000?
Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.4 out of 10 (240g / 8,47oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano Talica II 12IIAX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Shimano Talica II 12IIAX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX vs Shimano Tyrnos 30 II


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X


Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500X vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Shimano Tyrnos 30 II


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X


Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 HGFJX vs Shimano Cardiff 401A
