Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX

Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT
Spinning
72.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.74 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight240g / 8.47oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €98.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Shimano Twin Power XD A
Spinning
82.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.33 out of 10
Gear ratio6.4:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight200g / 7.05oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €359.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC 3000 XG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/210
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX edges out Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (9.5 out of 10) and the line retrieve per crank (94 centimeter / 37.01 inch). Still, Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX holds its own with strengths like a gear ratio of 5.2:1 and a ball bearings of 6, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT and Shimano Twin Power XD A?
Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX


Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Shimano Sienna 1000X vs Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX


Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 FJX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X


Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX


Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 FJX vs Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X vs Shimano Sienna 1000X


Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500X


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX


Shimano Sienna 1000X vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X


Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X


Shimano Sienna 1000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX


Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 FJX vs Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX vs Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX


Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX
