Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT
Spinning
79.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.74 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight240g / 8.47oz
Line retireve per crank99 centimeter / 38.98 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €98.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-CXH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD
Feeder And Match
90.30 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.94 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight300g / 10.58oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €292.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3010
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.26/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX edges out Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (9.5 out of 10) and the total score (9.03 out of 10). Still, Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 6 and a gear ratio of 6.2:1, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT and Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD?
Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for feeder and match conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX vs Shimano Stella FK C 5000 XGX


Shimano Stella FK C 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2000DX vs Delphin HORNET 30X


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Daiwa Nzon Distance 25


Delphin HORNET 30X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Shimano Stella FK C 5000 XGX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX


Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 5000-CX


Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X


Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2000DX


Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Delphin RAYA body


Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X
