Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT
Spinning
79.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.74 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight240g / 8.47oz
Line retireve per crank99 centimeter / 38.98 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €98.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-CXH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD
Feeder And Match
90.40 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.97 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight290g / 10.23oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €292.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3010
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.26/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX edges out Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (9.5 out of 10) and the total score (9.04 out of 10). Still, Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 6 and a gear ratio of 6.2:1, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT and Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD?
Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for feeder and match conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X


Delphin RAYA body vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X vs Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX


Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-PX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Daiwa TD Match 3012X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X vs Delphin RAYA body


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X vs Daiwa TD Match 3012X


Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX vs Delphin ELIXIR 4000X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX vs Delphin REDIX


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX


Delphin REDIX vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X


Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX vs Daiwa TD Match 3012X


Delphin ELIXIR 4000X vs Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX


Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX


Mitchell 300 4000X vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX
