Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX

Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT

Spinning

79.90 out of 100

Value for money4 out of 5

Quality classMedium

Durability3.74 out of 10

Ergonomics6.2 out of 10

Gear ratio6.2:1

Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs

Weight240g / 8.47oz

Line retireve per crank99 centimeter / 38.98 inch

Ball bearings6

Technical Specifications

BrandDAIWA
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €98.33
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size4000-CXH
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT

Spinning

95.00 out of 100

Value for money5 out of 5

Quality classExcellent

Durability5.5 out of 10

Ergonomics6.23 out of 10

Gear ratio5.2:1

Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs

Weight230g / 8.11oz

Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch

Ball bearings8

Technical Specifications

BrandDAIWA
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €218.10
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size4000D-C
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150

Conclusion

Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX edges out Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (5.5 out of 10) and the total score (9.5 out of 10). Still, Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX holds its own with strengths like a line retrieve per crank of 99 centimeter / 38.98 inch and a gear ratio of 6.2:1, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.