Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2500 / JB4 0.17MM YELLOW 2500X

Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT, 4000-CXH, left and right hand, Spinning Fishing Reel, Front Drag, 10609-401
Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT
Spinning
79.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.74 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight240g / 8.47oz
Line retireve per crank99 centimeter / 38.98 inch
Ball bearings6

Technical Specifications

  • BrandDAIWA
  • The main category of the reelSpinning
  • Price range~ €98.33
  • Is saltwater resistantNo
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size4000-CXH
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2500 / JB4 0.17MM YELLOW, 2500, left and right hand, Spinning fishing reel, bespult, Front Drag, 10006-250
Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2500 / JB4 0.17MM YELLOW
Spinning
2500x
62.60 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings4

Technical Specifications

  • BrandDAIWA
  • The main category of the reelSpinning
  • Price range~ €59.33
  • Is saltwater resistantNo
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size2500
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150

Conclusion

Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX edges out Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2500 / JB4 0.17MM YELLOW 2500X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the line retrieve per crank (99 centimeter / 38.98 inch) and the gear ratio (6.2:1). Still, Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2500 / JB4 0.17MM YELLOW 2500X holds its own with strengths like a weight of 230g / 8,11oz and a ergonomics of 6.23 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.

What's the difference between Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT and Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2500 / JB4 0.17MM YELLOW?

There are not much differences between the two comparables