Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag

Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT
Spinning
79.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.74 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight240g / 8.47oz
Line retireve per crank99 centimeter / 38.98 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €98.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-CXH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
43.10 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight380g / 13.40oz
Line retireve per crank95cm / 37.40 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €19.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.30mm/270m
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX clearly outshines Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and ball bearings (6). While Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT and Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag?
Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.4 out of 10 (240g / 8,47oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2000X vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX


Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2000X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 6000X


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2000X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2000X


Shimano Catana FE 4000X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X vs Shimano Aero C3000X


Shimano Complex XR 2500X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2000X


Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX


Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2000X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 6000X


Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X


Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R vs Shimano Catana FE 4000X


Shimano Catana FE 4000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2000X


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX
