Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT
Spinning
79.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.74 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight240g / 8.47oz
Line retireve per crank99 centimeter / 38.98 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €98.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-CXH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Shimano Tiagra
Multireels
89.30 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.4 out of 10
Gear ratio2.1:1 / 1:1
Maximum drag40kg / 88.18lbs
Weight4935g / 174.08oz
Line retireve per crank98 centimeter / 38.58 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €1,099.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size130A
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeLever drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofil-
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX and Shimano Tiagra 130AX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX offers a gear ratio of 6.2:1, while Shimano Tiagra 130AX stands out for a durability of 9.5 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT and Shimano Tiagra?
Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.4 out of 10 (240g / 8,47oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Shimano Tiagra 130AX
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Similar comparisons

Penn FIERCE IV 2000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Penn FIERCE IV 2000X


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X


Delphin HORNET 50X vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Shimano Sahara FJ 500X vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Penn FIERCE IV 2000X vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Penn FIERCE IV 2000X


Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX


Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Shimano Sahara FJ 500X vs Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Penn FIERCE IV 2000X
