Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX vs Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag

Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT, 4000-CXH, left and right hand, Spinning Fishing Reel, Front Drag, 10609-401
Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT
Spinning
79.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.74 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight240g / 8.47oz
Line retireve per crank99 centimeter / 38.98 inch
Ball bearings6

Technical Specifications

  • BrandDAIWA
  • The main category of the reelSpinning
  • Price range~ €98.33
  • Is saltwater resistantNo
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size4000-CXH
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag
Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag
Spinning
58.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.69 out of 10
Ergonomics4.03 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag2.5 kg - 5.5 lbs
Weight290 g - 10.3oz
Line retireve per crank82 cm / 32.3 inch
Ball bearings3+1

Technical Specifications

  • BrandSHIMANO
  • The main category of the reelSpinning
  • Price range~ €89.33
  • Is saltwater resistantNo
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size2500
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeRead drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.18-290 / 0,20-240 / 0,25-160 / 0,30-105 lb/yds: 6-200 / 8-140 / 10-120

Conclusion

Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX clearly outshines Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (6.2:1) and maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs). While Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.

What's the difference between Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT and Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag?

There are not much differences between the two comparables