Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX

Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT
Spinning
80.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.66 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank76 centimeter / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €199.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000 S-H
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/150

Abu GARCIA Zenon
Spinning
74.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.52 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag5.2kg / 11,46lbs
Weight143g / 5.04oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandABU GARCIA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €326.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 S
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.17/170
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX and Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX offers a ball bearings of 6, while Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX stands out for a durability of 9.5 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT and Abu GARCIA Zenon?
Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000-XHX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX


Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX


Daiwa Regal LT 1000 DX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX


Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX vs Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX vs Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX


Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX


Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX vs Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX


Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX vs Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag


Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2000 / JB4 0.13MM YELOW 2000X


Daiwa Regal LT 1000 DX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX


Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000-XHX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX vs Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX
