Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X

Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT

Spinning

80.00 out of 100

Value for money4 out of 5

Quality classGood

Durability4.66 out of 10

Ergonomics6.42 out of 10

Gear ratio5.8:1

Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs

Weight175g / 6.17oz

Line retireve per crank76 centimeter / 29.92 inch

Ball bearings6

Technical Specifications

BrandDAIWA
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €199.33
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size2000 S-H
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/150

Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF

Spinning

36.50 out of 100

Value for money3.5 out of 5

Quality classLow

Durability2.5 out of 10

Ergonomics6.38 out of 10

Gear ratio5.1:1

Maximum drag2.5kg / 5.51lbs

Weight185g / 6.53oz

Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch

Ball bearings4

Technical Specifications

BrandCORMORAN
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €20.30
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size1000
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/240

Conclusion

Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX clearly outshines Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X, offering significantly better performance in total score (8 out of 10) and maximum drag (5kg / 11,02lbs). While Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.

What's the difference between Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT and Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF?

Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX

A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.86 out of 10 (76 centimeter / 29.92 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles