Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX

Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT

Spinning

80.00 out of 100

Value for money4 out of 5

Quality classGood

Durability4.66 out of 10

Ergonomics6.42 out of 10

Gear ratio5.8:1

Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs

Weight175g / 6.17oz

Line retireve per crank76 centimeter / 29.92 inch

Ball bearings6

Technical Specifications

BrandDAIWA
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €199.33
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size2000 S-H
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/150

Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT

Spinning

78.90 out of 100

Value for money4 out of 5

Quality classGood

Durability4.65 out of 10

Ergonomics6.23 out of 10

Gear ratio5.2:1

Maximum drag0lbs

Weight230g / 8.11oz

Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.3 inch

Ball bearings6

Technical Specifications

BrandDAIWA
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €196.90
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size4000-C
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Conclusion

Both Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX and Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX offers a maximum drag of 5kg / 11,02lbs, while Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 82 centimeter / 32.3 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.