Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000-CXHX

Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT

Spinning

80.00 out of 100

Value for money4 out of 5

Quality classGood

Durability4.66 out of 10

Ergonomics6.42 out of 10

Gear ratio5.8:1

Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs

Weight175g / 6.17oz

Line retireve per crank76 centimeter / 29.92 inch

Ball bearings6

Technical Specifications

BrandDAIWA
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €199.33
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size2000 S-H
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/150

Daiwa 19 Certate

Spinning

95.00 out of 100

Value for money4.5 out of 5

Quality classExcellent

Durability9.5 out of 10

Ergonomics6.3 out of 10

Gear ratio6.2:1

Maximum drag-

Weight210g / 7.41oz

Line retireve per crank93 centimeter / 36.61 inch

Ball bearings10

Technical Specifications

BrandDAIWA
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €389.00
Is saltwater resistantYes
Spare spoolNo
Reel size3000-CXH
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Conclusion

Daiwa 19 Certate 3000-CXHX edges out Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (9.5 out of 10) and the line retrieve per crank (93 centimeter / 36.61 inch). Still, Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 6 and a maximum drag of 5kg / 11,02lbs, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.

What's the difference between Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT and Daiwa 19 Certate?

Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX

A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency