Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 4000D-CX

Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT
Spinning
80.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.66 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank76 centimeter / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €199.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000 S-H
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/150

Daiwa 19 Certate
Spinning
89.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.22 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight235g / 8.29oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €399.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX and Daiwa 19 Certate 4000D-CX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX offers a ball bearings of 6, while Daiwa 19 Certate 4000D-CX stands out for a durability of 9.5 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT and Daiwa 19 Certate?
Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Daiwa 19 Certate 4000D-CX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X vs Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX vs Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 6000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX


Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX vs Delphin IXTREK 2000X


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX


Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2500 / JB4 0.17MM YELLOW 2500X


Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX vs Delphin ELIXIR 2000X


Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 6000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX vs Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2500 / JB4 0.17MM YELLOW 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2500 / JB4 0.17MM YELLOW 2500X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X vs Delphin ELIXIR 2000X


Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X


Delphin ELIXIR 2000X vs Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag


Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX
