Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 4000D-CX

Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT
Spinning
80.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.66 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank76 centimeter / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €199.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000 S-H
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/150

Daiwa 19 Certate
Spinning
89.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.22 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight235g / 8.29oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €399.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX and Daiwa 19 Certate 4000D-CX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX offers a ball bearings of 6, while Daiwa 19 Certate 4000D-CX stands out for a durability of 9.5 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT and Daiwa 19 Certate?
Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Daiwa 19 Certate 4000D-CX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 1000X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X


Delphin ELIXIR 2000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX


Shimano Catana 3000 SRC vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X


Delphin INKS 3000X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX


Shimano Catana 3000 SRC vs Delphin ELIXIR 2000X


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Delphin INKS 3000X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 1000X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X


Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX vs Shimano 19 Stella 30000X


Delphin ELIXIR 2000X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX
