Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 4000D-CX

Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT
Spinning
80.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.66 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank76 centimeter / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €199.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000 S-H
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/150

Daiwa 19 Certate
Spinning
89.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.22 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight235g / 8.29oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €399.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX and Daiwa 19 Certate 4000D-CX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX offers a ball bearings of 6, while Daiwa 19 Certate 4000D-CX stands out for a durability of 9.5 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT and Daiwa 19 Certate?
Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Daiwa 19 Certate 4000D-CX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X vs Shimano Catana FE 1000X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X


Shimano Stradic GTM 4000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X


Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Sahara 2500 R


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano Stradic GTM 3000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX


Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X


Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CX


Daiwa Certate LT 19 5000D-XHX vs Shimano Stradic GTM 3000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x


Daiwa Certate LT 19 5000D-XHX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X


Shimano Sahara 2500 R vs Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX


Shimano Stradic GTM 4000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX


Shimano Stradic GTM 4000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX


Shimano Stradic GTM 4000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX
