Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT
Spinning
80.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.66 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank76 centimeter / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €199.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000 S-H
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/150

Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD
Feeder And Match
84.70 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight405g / 14.29oz
Line retireve per crank86 centimeter / 33.86 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €299.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4010
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.26/150
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX and Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX offers a ball bearings of 6, while Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX stands out for a durability of 9.5 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT and Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD?
Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX
- With a score like 8.83 out of 10 (175g / 6,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for feeder and match conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Aero C3000X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500SHGAX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX


Daiwa Nzon Distance 25 vs Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500SHGAX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX
