Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX

Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT

Spinning

80.00 out of 100

Value for money4 out of 5

Quality classGood

Durability4.66 out of 10

Ergonomics6.42 out of 10

Gear ratio5.8:1

Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs

Weight175g / 6.17oz

Line retireve per crank76 centimeter / 29.92 inch

Ball bearings6

Technical Specifications

BrandDAIWA
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €199.33
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size2000 S-H
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/150

Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity

Spinning

84.90 out of 100

Value for money3.5 out of 5

Quality classExcellent

Durability5.63 out of 10

Ergonomics6.33 out of 10

Gear ratio5.2:1

Maximum drag-

Weight200g / 7.05oz

Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch

Ball bearings11

Technical Specifications

BrandDAIWA
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €484.00
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size4000-C
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/200

Conclusion

Both Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX and Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX offers a ball bearings of 6, while Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX stands out for a durability of 5.63 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.

What's the difference between Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT and Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity?

Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX

A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency