Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX

Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT
Spinning
80.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.66 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank76 centimeter / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €199.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000 S-H
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/150

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
84.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.5 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight150g / 5.29oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €635.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000D-P
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX and Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX offers a ball bearings of 6, while Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX stands out for a durability of 9.5 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?
Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.86 out of 10 (76 centimeter / 29.92 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 19 Certate 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 3000-CX


Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX vs Shimano Complex XR C2000X


Shimano Complex XR C2000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X


Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X


Shimano Complex XR C2000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX


Delphin IXTREK 4000X vs Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX


Delphin IXTREK 4000X vs Shimano Complex XR C2000X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF


Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX vs Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa GS LTD 3000X


Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 19 Certate 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 3000-C / JB4 0.19MM YELLOW 3000-CX


Shimano Complex XR C2000X vs Daiwa 19 Certate 4000D-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 3000-C / JB4 0.19MM YELLOW 3000-CX vs Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX
