Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX

Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT

Spinning

80.00 out of 100

Value for money4 out of 5

Quality classGood

Durability4.66 out of 10

Ergonomics6.42 out of 10

Gear ratio5.8:1

Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs

Weight175g / 6.17oz

Line retireve per crank76 centimeter / 29.92 inch

Ball bearings6

Technical Specifications

BrandDAIWA
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €199.33
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size2000 S-H
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/150

Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH

Spinning

3000d-cxhx

72.80 out of 100

Value for money3 out of 5

Quality classLow

Durability3 out of 10

Ergonomics6.32 out of 10

Gear ratio6.2:1

Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs

Weight205g / 7.23oz

Line retireve per crank93 centimeter / 36.61 inch

Ball bearings6

Technical Specifications

BrandDAIWA
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €76.33
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size3000D-CXH
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/150

Conclusion

Both Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX and Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX offers a total score of 8 out of 10, while Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX stands out for a maximum drag of 10kg / 22,05lbs. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.