Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X

Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT
Spinning
80.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.66 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank76 centimeter / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €199.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000 S-H
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/150

Delphin IXCELA AL BODY
Spinning
47.50 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag-
Weight313g / 11.04oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings6+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €56.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/315
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX clearly outshines Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (5kg / 11,02lbs) and line retrieve per crank (76 centimeter / 29.92 inch). While Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT and Delphin IXCELA AL BODY?
Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- With a score like 8.83 out of 10 (175g / 6,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.86 out of 10 (76 centimeter / 29.92 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX


Penn Battle III 3000X vs Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX


Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X vs Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X vs Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX


Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Sahara 500 FI


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500X


Shimano Sahara 500 FI vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000-XHX vs Shimano Catana 4000 RC


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500X vs Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX


Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000-XHX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000-XHX


Shimano Catana 4000 RC vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX


Shimano Complex XR C2000X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000-XHX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000-XHX vs Penn Battle III 3000X


Shimano Complex XR C2000X vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 4000-CX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX
