Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 5000X

Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT
Spinning
80.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.66 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank76 centimeter / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €199.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000 S-H
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/150

Delphin IXCELA AL BODY
Spinning
45.90 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag-
Weight334g / 11.78oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings6+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €59.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size5000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.22/440
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX clearly outshines Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 5000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (5kg / 11,02lbs) and line retrieve per crank (76 centimeter / 29.92 inch). While Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 5000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT and Delphin IXCELA AL BODY?
Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- With a score like 8.83 out of 10 (175g / 6,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.86 out of 10 (76 centimeter / 29.92 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Similar comparisons

Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Stradic FM


Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Delphin SHARX 4000X


Delphin SHARX 4000X vs Penn Battle III 6000X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX


Delphin SHARX 6000X vs Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX


Penn Battle III 6000X vs Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX


Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX


Delphin SHARX 4000X vs Delphin SHARX 6000X


Delphin SHARX 6000X vs Delphin ELIXIR 5000X


Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX vs Delphin ELIXIR 5000X


Shimano Catana 2500 RC vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF
