Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag

Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT
Spinning
80.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.66 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank76 centimeter / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €199.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000 S-H
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/150

Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
45.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank68cm / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.20mm/140m
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX clearly outshines Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (5kg / 11,02lbs) and ball bearings (6). While Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT and Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag?
Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.86 out of 10 (76 centimeter / 29.92 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X


Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX vs Delphin INKS 4000X


Shimano Stella FK 4000 XGX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX


Shimano Aero BB C3000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X


Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X


Delphin INKS 4000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX


Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X vs Shimano Ultegra C3000DX


Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX


Shimano Aero BB C3000X vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X


Shimano Ultegra C3000DX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X


Delphin INKS 4000X vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X


Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X


Shimano Vanquish FC C5000XGCX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX


Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX


Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X vs Shimano Vanquish FC C5000XGCX
