Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag

Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT
Spinning
80.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.66 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank76 centimeter / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €199.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000 S-H
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/150

Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
42.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight370g / 13.05oz
Line retireve per crank92cm / 36.22 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.30mm/220m
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX clearly outshines Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (5kg / 11,02lbs) and ball bearings (6). While Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT and Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag?
Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- With a score like 8.83 out of 10 (175g / 6,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX vs Daiwa BG 6500X


Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 4000-CX


Daiwa BG 6500X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX


Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX vs Shimano Stella FK 1000X


Daiwa Crossfire LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa BG 6500X


Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX vs Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 3000-CX


Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 5000 XGFJX


Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX


Daiwa BG 6500X vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 4000-CX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX


Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX


Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX
