Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag

Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT
Spinning
80.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.66 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank76 centimeter / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €199.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000 S-H
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/150

Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
43.10 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight380g / 13.40oz
Line retireve per crank95cm / 37.40 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €19.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.30mm/270m
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX clearly outshines Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (5kg / 11,02lbs) and ball bearings (6). While Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT and Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag?
Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- With a score like 8.83 out of 10 (175g / 6,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano Catana FE 1000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX


Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000DX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX


Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX


Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX


Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 HGX


Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX vs Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000DX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX vs Shimano Sahara 4000 R


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX


Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX


Shimano Catana FE 1000X vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX


Shimano Catana FE 1000X vs Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 HGFJX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000DX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX vs Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X vs Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 HGFJX


Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX
