Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX

Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT
Spinning
80.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.66 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank76 centimeter / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €199.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000 S-H
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/150

Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
59.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio7.0:1
Maximum drag6.8kg / 14,99lbs
Weight323g / 11.39oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €208.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/280
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX clearly outshines Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (5.8:1) and ball bearings (6). While Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT and Penn 2020 Clash II?
Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX
- A fast gear ratio of 9.2 out of 10 (5.8:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.83 out of 10 (175g / 6,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.86 out of 10 (76 centimeter / 29.92 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 1000D(U)X vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 1000D(U)X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX vs Daiwa GS LTD 3000X


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Shimano Vanquish FC C2500SCX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 1000D(U)X vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 1000D(U)X vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Complex XR C2000X vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX


Shimano Vanquish FC C2500SCX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000DX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Shimano Sedona 8000 FI


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000DX


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X vs Shimano Vanquish FC C2500SCX
