Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT
Spinning
80.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.66 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank76 centimeter / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €199.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000 S-H
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/150

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (5.8:1) and maximum drag (5kg / 11,02lbs). While Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX
- A fast gear ratio of 9.2 out of 10 (5.8:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
Similar comparisons

Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX


Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX


Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500HGAX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX vs Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX


Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500HGAX


Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Shimano Vanford FA 2500HGAX vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500HGAX


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X vs Shimano Tyrnos 30 II


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX vs Shimano FX 2500 FCX


Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX


Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Shimano FX 2500 FCX


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX
