Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 8000 PGX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT
Spinning
80.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.66 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank76 centimeter / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €199.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000 S-H
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/150

Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C
Seafishing
95.00 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.52 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight615g / 21.69oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSeafishing
- Price range~ €429.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000 PG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.41/230
Conclusion
Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 8000 PGX edges out Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (9.5 out of 10) and the line retrieve per crank (94 centimeter / 37.01 inch). Still, Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 6 and a ergonomics of 6.42 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT and Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C?
Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 8000 PGX
- Built tough for the salt, ideal for seafishing.
Similar comparisons

Shimano 21 Stradic SW 6000 HGX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX


Shimano 21 Stradic SW 6000 HGX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa BG MQ 4000D-XHX


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 8000 HGX vs Shimano 21 Stradic SW 8000 HGX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-PX vs Shimano Stradic SWB 6000XGX


Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-PX


Shimano Stradic SWB 8000PGX vs Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-PX vs Shimano Stradic SWB 8000PGX


Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 1000X


Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 8000 HGX


Shimano 21 Stradic SW 6000 HGX vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 6000 XGX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX vs Shimano 21 Stradic SW 6000 HGX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 1000D-XH 1000D-XHX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 8000 HGX


Shimano Stradic SWB 6000XGX vs Daiwa BG MQ 4000D-XHX


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 6000 XGX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX vs Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 10000 PGX vs Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R


Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R vs Delphin BRONZ 2000X


Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R vs Shimano 21 Stradic SW 8000 HGX
