Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Shimano Stella FK 1000X

Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT
Spinning
80.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.66 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank76 centimeter / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €199.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000 S-H
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/150

Shimano Stella FK
Spinning
85.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight170g / 6oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings12+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €579.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 140/0.14
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX and Shimano Stella FK 1000X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX offers a ball bearings of 6, while Shimano Stella FK 1000X stands out for a durability of 9.5 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT and Shimano Stella FK?
Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.86 out of 10 (76 centimeter / 29.92 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Shimano Stella FK 1000X
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX vs Delphin BRONZ 4000X


Shimano 19 Stella 8000 PGX vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX


Delphin ELIXIR 3000X vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX


Penn Battle III 6000X vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX


Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX vs Penn Battle III 6000X


Penn Battle III 6000X vs Shimano Stradic GTM 3000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Delphin BRONZ 4000X vs Shimano Stradic GTM 3000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX vs Shimano 19 Stella 8000 PGX


Shimano Complex XR C2000X vs Delphin IXTREK 4000X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX vs Delphin ELIXIR 3000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX


Shimano Complex XR C2000X vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX


Delphin INKS 3000X vs Delphin BRONZ 4000X


Shimano Stradic GTM 3000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Delphin IXTREK 4000X


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX


Shimano Complex XR C2000X vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X


Delphin BRONZ 4000X vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X


Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX


Shimano Stradic GTM 3000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Delphin ELIXIR 3000X
