Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Shimano Sedona 6000 FI

Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT
Spinning
80.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.66 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank76 centimeter / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €199.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000 S-H
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/150

Shimano Sedona 6000 FI
Spinning
32.80 out of 100
Value for money2 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.6:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.04lbs
Weight425g / 14.99oz
Line retireve per crank83cm / 32.68inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €71.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000 FI
- Handle typeHandle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.33/240. 0.37/190, 0.405/160 lb/yds: 12/265, 16/170, 20/120
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX clearly outshines Shimano Sedona 6000 FI, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (5.8:1) and weight (175g / 6,17oz). While Shimano Sedona 6000 FI may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT and Shimano Sedona 6000 FI?
Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX
- A fast gear ratio of 9.2 out of 10 (5.8:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.83 out of 10 (175g / 6,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Solid value at €199.33, reliable and great performance, it’s a smart choice for a variety of spinning fishing needs
Similar comparisons

Shimano Complex XR 2500X vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX


Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX vs Delphin CarbonIX 3000X


Shimano Vanford FA C3000AX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX


Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 5000X


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000DX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX vs Daiwa Freams LT 5000D-CX


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 5000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 5000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX vs Daiwa Freams LT 5000D-CX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 5000X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X
