Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x

Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT
Spinning
84.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.66 out of 10
Ergonomics6.35 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight195g / 6.88oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter / 34.25 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €199.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 S-XH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/150

Abu GARCIA Zenon
Spinning
86.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.54 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight138g / 4.87oz
Line retireve per crank69 centimeter / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandABU GARCIA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €326.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000 S
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.17/100
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX and Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX offers a ball bearings of 6, while Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x stands out for a durability of 9.5 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT and Abu GARCIA Zenon?
Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX
- 8.2 out of 10 (87 centimeter / 34.25 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Stella FK 1000X vs Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Stella FK 1000X


Shimano Stella FK 1000X vs Shimano Aero C3000X


Shimano Stella FK 1000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX


Penn Battle III 2000X vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2000D-XH 2000D-XHX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 1000D-XH 1000D-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX


Shimano Stella FK 2500X vs Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X


Shimano Stella FK 1000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2000D-XH 2000D-XHX


Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Stella FK 1000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2000D-XH 2000D-XHX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X vs Shimano Aero C3000X


Shimano Stella FK 2500X vs Shimano Stella FK 1000X


Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 1000D-XH 1000D-XHX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX


Shimano Vanford FA 2500HGAX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX


Shimano Vanford FA 2500HGAX vs Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX


Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2000D-XH 2000D-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX
