Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX

Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT
Spinning
84.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.66 out of 10
Ergonomics6.35 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight195g / 6.88oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter / 34.25 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €199.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 S-XH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/150

Abu GARCIA Zenon
Spinning
74.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.52 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag5.2kg / 11,46lbs
Weight143g / 5.04oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandABU GARCIA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €326.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 S
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.17/170
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX and Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX offers a ball bearings of 6, while Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX stands out for a durability of 9.5 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT and Abu GARCIA Zenon?
Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Catana 1000 RC vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX


Daiwa Ninja LT 6000X vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 FJX


Delphin CarbonIX 3000X vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX


Delphin CarbonIX 3000X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX


Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 FJX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X vs Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000HGAX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000HGAX


Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 FJX


Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 FJX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X vs Delphin CarbonIX 3000X
