Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X

Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT

Spinning

84.40 out of 100

Value for money4 out of 5

Quality classGood

Durability4.66 out of 10

Ergonomics6.35 out of 10

Gear ratio6.2:1

Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs

Weight195g / 6.88oz

Line retireve per crank87 centimeter / 34.25 inch

Ball bearings6

Technical Specifications

BrandDAIWA
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €199.33
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size2500 S-XH
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/150

Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF

Spinning

36.50 out of 100

Value for money3.5 out of 5

Quality classLow

Durability2.5 out of 10

Ergonomics6.38 out of 10

Gear ratio5.1:1

Maximum drag2.5kg / 5.51lbs

Weight185g / 6.53oz

Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch

Ball bearings4

Technical Specifications

BrandCORMORAN
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €20.30
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size1000
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/240

Conclusion

Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX clearly outshines Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X, offering significantly better performance in total score (8.44 out of 10) and line retrieve per crank (87 centimeter / 34.25 inch). While Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.

What's the difference between Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT and Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF?

Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX

A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
8.2 out of 10 (87 centimeter / 34.25 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish