Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX

Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT
Spinning
84.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.66 out of 10
Ergonomics6.35 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight195g / 6.88oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter / 34.25 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €199.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 S-XH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/150

Daiwa 19 Certate
Spinning
89.20 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.3 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight210g / 7.41oz
Line retireve per crank77 centimeter / 30.31 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €389.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/150
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX and Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX offers a ball bearings of 6, while Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX stands out for a durability of 9.5 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT and Daiwa 19 Certate?
Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX


Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 FJX vs Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500X


Shimano Super 4000 GT RD vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500X


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX


Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 FJX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500X vs Shimano Super 4000 GT RD


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X


Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X


Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CXHX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX
