Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 4000CXHX

Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT
Spinning
84.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.66 out of 10
Ergonomics6.35 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight195g / 6.88oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter / 34.25 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €199.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 S-XH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/150

Daiwa 19 Certate
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.22 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight235g / 8.29oz
Line retireve per crank99 centimeter / 38.98 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €399.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000CXH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 19 Certate 4000CXHX edges out Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (9.5 out of 10) and the line retrieve per crank (99 centimeter / 38.98 inch). Still, Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 6 and a maximum drag of 5kg / 11,02lbs, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT and Daiwa 19 Certate?
Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Daiwa 19 Certate 4000CXHX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX vs Shimano 19 Stella 14000 XGX


Shimano Catana FE C 3000X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2000DX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX


Shimano Stradic FM vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2000DX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX vs Shimano 19 Stella 14000 XGX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX


Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Stradic FM


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX


Shimano Stradic FM vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX
