Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 4000D-CX

Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT
Spinning
84.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.66 out of 10
Ergonomics6.35 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight195g / 6.88oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter / 34.25 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €199.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 S-XH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/150

Daiwa 19 Certate
Spinning
89.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.22 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight235g / 8.29oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €399.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX and Daiwa 19 Certate 4000D-CX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX offers a ball bearings of 6, while Daiwa 19 Certate 4000D-CX stands out for a durability of 9.5 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT and Daiwa 19 Certate?
Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Daiwa 19 Certate 4000D-CX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X


Shimano Sedona 8000 FI vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX vs Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X


Daiwa Ninja LT 6000X vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX


Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX


Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Sedona 8000 FI


Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX


Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X


Daiwa Ninja LT 6000X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX


Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 6000X


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X vs Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX


Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX vs Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 6000X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX
